案例|咨询留言|东泽律师|法律法规|人大环境资源研究| 设为首页 收藏
搜索:
标题 内容 作者
我要投稿
AN eva lUATION OF THE CHINESE LEGAL SYSTEM(七)
2013-12-19 16:43:14 来源: 作者: 【 】 浏览:6419次 评论:0
viving system to meet the basic
needs of human beings.”24 Next is the difference in what needs should be
met. The basic law underlines material needs and cultural needs, while
sustainable development emphasizes reasonable needs. Moreover, the
difference lies in the way to achieve those needs. The basic law advocates
promoting economic development through the growth of human desire and
social requirements. In contrast, sustainable development stands for the
function of limiting factors. Nowadays, this basic law is heavily criticized in
Chinese academic circles, but it has not been thoroughly rejected officially. In
recent years, China is transforming its economic development mode, and this
might finally decide the destiny of the basic law.
III. IMPROVEMENT AND OUTLOOK
To improve the status quo of sustainable development, we should break
the bottlenecks to improve the present system and in the meantime, to seize
the opportunity to make innovations. The following two aspects should be
prioritized.
A. Valuing Legislation
Legislation and parliamentary bodies tend to play an active role in
sustainable development in recent years. “A strong integration of
parliamentary bodies and MPs would offer new opportunities at several
levels. Firstly, discussion in parliamentary bodies can improve the quality of
the strategy. One also should not underestimate the public impact of a
parliamentary debate over the sustainability strategy. Finally, discussion in
parliamentary bodies through directly elected representatives of the people is
a desirable approach from a democratic perspective.”25
24 Wenhu Ye, ed., 可持续发展的新进展 (New Progress in Sustainable Development),
Science Press, at 117 (2008).
25 Sustainability Strategies in the European Union and Options for Underpinning them in
the National Parliaments. An Expert Study by Forum Sustainable Austria commissioned by
the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (p. 40).
120 FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA [Vol. 8: 103
On 10 March 2011, Wu Bangguo, Chairman of the Standing Committee
of the National People’s Congress stated at the 4th session of the 11th
National People’s Congress, the goal of forming a legal system of socialism
with Chinese characteristics has been successfully fulfilled. He laid stress on
the point that “solved the fundamental, overall, stable and long-lasting
problems by system and law”26 when talking about the function of this
system. These issues have been China’s official orientation (national policy
and economic development strategies) to sustainable development for a long
time. In recent years, the law-making bodies in China have attached
increasing attention to environment issues including sustainable development
issues. For instance, the Resolutions of the Standing Committee of the
National People’s Congress on Actively Addressing Climate Change of 2009
push forward the legislation process of ministries and local governments.
China lays emphasis on keeping pace and coordinating with UN and
international communities. The experiences brought from European
Parliament on sustainable development will be an important lesson for
China’s law-making bodies, especially on the aspects of improvement of
legislation, supervision on government, encouraging public participation and
empowering the public with legal rights.
Post eva luation will be a new mission for China after the establishment of
the legal system. Post eva luation refers to the eva luation on the
implementation of a certain law or regulation including achievements and
problems that exist after a certain period of enforcement. The objective is to
better execute existing laws, improve eva luated laws and regulations and
provide guidance for relevant legislations. After the formation of the socialist
legal system with distinct Chinese characteristics, China will enter into the
post-lawmaking period. It is a turning point. The gap of legislation is already
filled. The focus can be switched from speeding up legislation to solving
problems of the legislation, and to constructing a modern legal system. In
short, China is now paying attention to making laws scientifically to precision,
and to embody democracy and people’s well-being in legislations.27 On 27
June 2010, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress
26 http://www.news.china.com.cn (last visited Oct. 3, 2011).
27 Ronggen Yu, 法律体系形成后的立法评估 (eva luation on Legislation after the Formation
of Legal System), 法制日报 (Legal Daily), Mar. 21, 2011.
2013] CHINESE LEGAL SYSTEM ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 121
reviewed the report of the trial implementation submitted by the Legislative
Affairs Committee at the 21st session.
It is necessary to conduct legal eva luation on sustainable development for
two main reasons. First, sustainable development itself is a mechanism that
needs continuous exploration and improvement. Second, it should undergo an
assessment process when the universally accepted concept is put into effect
with actual situations. The post eva luation has just started in China. The first
example of post eva luation is the Measures of the Ministry of Land and
Resource Regarding Post eva luation of Regulatory and Normative
Documents, which was enacted on 7 September 2010. This demonstrates the
government’s special attention to the post eva luation of the legislation on
environment and natural resources. The essential point is to develop a
scientific eva luation method and standard and define the elements and
principles of eva luation. China may refer to the lessons of the United Nations
and European countries.
B. Green Economy Infuses New Vigor to Sustainable Development
The concept of “green economy” was first put forward in Pearce’s “Blue
Print for a Green Economy” published in 1989. The United Nations
Environment Program’s proposal enabled the loosely defined theory to
become influential globally. The United Nations Environment Program
(UNEP) released the two reports of “Green Economy” and “Green New
Deal” in October and December 2008 respectively. The primary objective
was to promote economic recovery, create jobs, reduce carbon emissions,
repair degraded ecosystems and tackle water shortages through innovation in
the “green economy” and “green new deal.” Moreover, the UNEP aims to
achieve the Millennium Development Goals ― which call for the alleviation
of extreme poverty in the world by the end of 2025 ― despite the challenges
created by the global economic crisis.28 The core idea of the initiative
demonstrates that the greening of economy will not be a burden. It serves as
an engine of growth instead. The report of Gree
责任编辑:dongzelaw
】 【打印繁体】 【投稿】 【收藏】 【推荐】 【举报】 【评论】 【关闭】 【返回顶部
我来说两句
已有0评论 点击全部查看
帐号: 密码: (新用户注册)
验证码:
表情:
内容:
网友关注排行
科技
数码
科普
财经
新闻视频