时 军 周富荣 :我国环境公益诉讼的实现路径选择(三)
|
dash;—起诉主体的正当性、可行性和合理性分析》，载《太平洋学报》2011年第4期。 ④ 参见解安宁、姚硕珉：《构建我国环境公益诉讼原告资格的法学探讨》，载《法制与社会》2009年第35期。 ⑤ 参见张祖妍：《环境公益诉讼的立法缺陷与完善》，载《环境科学与管理》2009年第3期。 ⑥《国务院关于环境保护若干问题的决定》，载中国环境法网http://www.riel.whu.edu.cn/article.asp?id=47，最后访问日期：2012年1月2日。 275 2012 年全国环境资源法学研讨会（年会）论文集 Abstract: With the increasingly serious environmental problems, in the establishment of China's environmental litigation system become consensus. Environmental public interest litigation is the first step to the realization of the optimal case filed a lawsuit, the court according to law to accept. But in present Chinese civil procedure law of the "direct interests" and the administrative procedure law of the "law of the interested" to the plaintiff qualification strictly limited and obstruct the realization of a step. In the light of how to solve realization of the environmental public interest litigation to this dilemma, put forward the solution of different academic path. All kinds of environmental public interest litigation is the realization of the path, the law explained the methods with low cost and the resistance of small and more feasibility, is in the present system conditions for the establishment of environmental public litigation system is more feasible path. 作者简介：时军，女，法学博士，中国海洋大学法政学院副教授，主要从事环境法学基本理论研究。 周富荣，女，中国海洋大学法政学院2009级环境与资源保护法学专业硕士研究生。 276 |
我来说两句
已有0评论 点击全部查看
