案例|咨询留言|东泽律师|法律法规|人大环境资源研究| 设为首页 收藏
搜索:
标题 内容 作者
我要投稿
谷德近:共同但有区别责任的重塑∗(五)
2012-06-29 14:44:33 来源: 作者: 【 】 浏览:13311次 评论:0
, Southern Moral Entitlement, and International Environmental Governance [J], 27 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 363, 2002.
[13] Nina E. Bafundo, Compliance with the Ozone Treaty: Weak States and the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility[J], 21 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 461, 2006.
51《坎昆协定:附件一缔约方在《京都议定书》之下的进一步承诺问题特设工作组第十五届会议的工作结果》,载《京都议定书》缔约方会议第1/CMP6号决定。
52 《坎昆协定:《公约》之下的长期合作问题特设工作组的工作结果》,载《气候变化框架公约》缔约方大会第1/CP.16号决定附件。
53《里约环境与发展宣言》原则7。
556
可持续发展·环境保护·防灾减灾
[14] Mary J. Bortscheller, Exploring how today’s Development Affects Future Generations around the Globe: in This Issue: Climate Law Reporter: Equitable but Ineffective: How the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities Hobbles the Global Fight against Climate Change[J], 10 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 49,2010.
[15] 谷德近. 巴厘岛路线图:共同但有区别责任的演进[J]. 法学, 2008(2).
Abstract: Common but Differentiated Responsibilities could guide to distribute differentiated obligation of global environmental governance between developed and developing countries, and adopted by Kyoto Protocol based on the historical responsibility and financial and technological advantages of developed countries and the priority of economic and social development of developing countries. Based on comparison between Kyoto Protocol and Montreal Protocol and analysis of the latest progress of climate negotiation by 2010, the legitimacy of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities could be reconstructed as sovereignty and its responsibility of doing no harm to environment of other states or beyond national jurisdiction, and fair distribution of benefit from global environmental governance.
Key words: Common but Differentiated Responsibilities; Kyoto Protocol; Montreal Protocol
557
责任编辑:dongzelaw
】 【打印繁体】 【投稿】 【收藏】 【推荐】 【举报】 【评论】 【关闭】 【返回顶部
我来说两句
已有0评论 点击全部查看
帐号: 密码: (新用户注册)
验证码:
表情:
内容:
网友关注排行
科技
数码
科普
财经
新闻视频